AMD Radeon R7 350 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 68% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.6 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 192
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- 4500x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- 4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7787 versus 1946
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.508 versus 6.705
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 versus 100.391
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 versus 0.441
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 versus 8.146
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 versus 20.64
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 versus 977
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 versus 1494
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1833
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 versus 977
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 versus 1494
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 1833
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 versus 27 March 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 versus 1946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 versus 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 versus 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 versus 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 versus 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 versus 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 versus 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 versus 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 versus 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 versus 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 1833 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 800 MHz
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 55 Watt
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 55 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | 1946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1833 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | GK208B |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 | 27 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1083 | 1488 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 292 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 350 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDFirePro M4150
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
