AMD Radeon R7 370 versus AMD Radeon HD 7990
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 370 and AMD Radeon HD 7990 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 370
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 3.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 375 Watt
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 versus 88.328
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7102 versus 6689
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7102 versus 6689
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 24 April 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 versus 88.328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 versus 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 versus 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7990
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 975 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 62.4 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 2x 2048 versus 1024
- 4.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 4,096 gflops versus 1,997 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2x 3 GB versus 4 GB
- 6.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 975 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5566 versus 4505
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 606
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 88.665 versus 72.514
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1753.494 versus 1506.404
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.437 versus 7.267
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 434.598 versus 359.237
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 975 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 62.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,096 gflops versus 1,997 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 3 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 975 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5566 versus 4505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 88.665 versus 72.514 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1753.494 versus 1506.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.437 versus 7.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 434.598 versus 359.237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 3707 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7990
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 370 | AMD Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4505 | 5566 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | 88.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | 1753.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | 8.437 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | 88.328 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | 434.598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 370 | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Trinidad | Malta |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 24 April 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 420 | 421 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $1,126.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 975 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,997 gflops | 2x 4,096 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 2048 |
| Stream Processors | 1024 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.4 GTexel / s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 4,313 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 152 mm | 307 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2x 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB/s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 975 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 370 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
ATIRadeon X1650 GTO
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000M
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
NVIDIATesla K20m
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7990
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
AppleM1 7-core
