AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 925 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 84 Watt
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1938 versus 605
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9616 versus 3385
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.788 versus 8.915
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.196 versus 146.479
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.619 versus 1.178
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 versus 10.689
- 16.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 versus 6.64
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 versus 3342
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 versus 3342
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 1 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 84 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1938 versus 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9616 versus 3385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 versus 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 versus 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 versus 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 versus 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 versus 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 versus 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 versus 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3345 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 versus 535
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 versus 535 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1938 | 605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 | 963 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9616 | 3385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 1 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 768 | 685 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | 350 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 84 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 392 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |