AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 925 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 535 versus 418
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 versus 13.832
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 versus 78.867
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 11 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 versus 418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 versus 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 versus 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 512
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 947.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3846 versus 1938
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12513 versus 9616
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 24.788
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 versus 638.196
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 2.619
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 versus 2809
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 versus 2809
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 947.2 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3846 versus 1938 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12513 versus 9616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 24.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 versus 638.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 2.619 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 versus 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 versus 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 versus 3666 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1938 | 3846 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 | 418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9616 | 12513 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 11 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 769 | 762 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
