AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 9306
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 69.814
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 versus 1050
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 versus 1050 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 5.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 43% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 758 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.72 GTexel / s versus 16.46 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,111 gflops versus 526.8 gflops
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 versus 15.145
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 versus 206.354
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 versus 1.2
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 versus 24.15
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 versus 1979
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 2101
- 134.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 versus 33.5
- 109.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 33.9
- 55.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 60
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 758 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s versus 16.46 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops versus 526.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 versus 15.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 versus 206.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 versus 1.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 versus 24.15 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 versus 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 2101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 versus 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | 1050 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Wani | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1435 | 724 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Prix maintenant | $150.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
ATIRadeon 7200
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Go
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
IntelHD Graphics 515
