AMD Radeon R9 M360 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.6 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 19% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 947.2 gflops versus 793.3 gflops
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8200 versus 6117
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 versus 335.835
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 versus 1.651
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 versus 27.096
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3309
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3309
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops versus 793.3 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8200 versus 6117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 versus 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 versus 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 versus 27.096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2139 versus 1807
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 472 versus 412
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 versus 19.479
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 87.811
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 2801
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 versus 1623
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 2801
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 versus 1623
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2139 versus 1807 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 versus 412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 versus 19.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 87.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 versus 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 versus 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 versus 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 versus 1623 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1807 | 2139 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 472 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8200 | 6117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.479 | 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 | 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 | 27.096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 | 97.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1623 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1623 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Tropo | GM107 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1003 | 1004 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 8 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 793.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M360 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
AMDFirePro M5950
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M275
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M445DX
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
