AMD Radeon R9 M380 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R9 M380

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M380

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 48 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s
Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 1,439 gflops
Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2771 versus 2581
2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 529 versus 217
Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12640 versus 9740
Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.907 versus 373.644
Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 versus 2.54
Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 versus 39.412
Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 versus 139.158

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	5 May 2015 versus 13 March 2015
Taux de remplissage de la texture	48 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 versus 640
Performance á point flottant	1,536 gflops versus 1,439 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2771 versus 2581
PassMark - G2D Mark	529 versus 217
Geekbench - OpenCL	12640 versus 9740
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	546.907 versus 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.618 versus 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	48.878 versus 39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	194.051 versus 139.158

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 914 MHz versus 900 MHz
Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 1000 MHz
Environ 67% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1000 or 2500 MHz versus 1500 MHz
Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 versus 34.701
Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 versus 3688
6.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 536
Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2855
Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 versus 3688
6.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 536
Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2855

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	914 MHz versus 900 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1124 MHz versus 1000 MHz
Vitesse de mémoire	1000 or 2500 MHz versus 1500 MHz
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.396 versus 34.701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4148 versus 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 versus 536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 versus 2855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4148 versus 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 versus 536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 versus 2855

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2771

2581

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

529

217

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12640

9740

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.701

42.396

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

546.907

373.644

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.618

2.54

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

48.878

39.412

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

194.051

139.158

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3688

4148

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

536

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2855

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3688

4148

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

536

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2855

3358

Nom	AMD Radeon R9 M380	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2771	2581
PassMark - G2D Mark	529	217
Geekbench - OpenCL	12640	9740
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	34.701	42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	546.907	373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.618	2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	48.878	39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	194.051	139.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3688	4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	536	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2855	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3688	4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	536	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2855	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3350

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon R9 M380	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Maxwell
Nom de code	Strato	GM107
Conception	AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Date de sortie	5 May 2015	13 March 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	862	878
Genre	Desktop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1000 MHz	1124 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	900 MHz	914 MHz
Performance á point flottant	1,536 gflops	1,439 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	640
Taux de remplissage de la texture	48 GTexel / s	44.96 GTexel / s
Compte de transistor	2,080 million	1,870 million
Noyaux CUDA		640
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		75 Watt
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++)		1
HDMI
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA		1
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Taille du laptop	medium sized	medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	96 GB / s	32 or 80 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1500 MHz	1000 or 2500 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	DDR3 or GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DirectCompute 5.0
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Graphiques changeables
TrueAudio
ZeroCore
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI