AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 1006 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 195 Watt
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 versus 531
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 versus 46.086
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 36.463
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 versus 99.577
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 1006 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 195 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 versus 531 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 versus 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 versus 4.645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 36.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 versus 99.577 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Environ 92% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 128.8 billion / sec versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 71% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 896
- 1404.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,090.4 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5581 versus 4102
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18388 versus 17594
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 versus 970.421
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 versus 6821
- 62.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 versus 115.4
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2004 versus 1730
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5581 versus 4102 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18388 versus 17594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 versus 970.421 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 versus 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 versus 115.4 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 versus 1730 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4102 | 5581 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 531 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17594 | 18388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 989.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 4.645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 36.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 99.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | 7222 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | 2004 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GK104 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 22 March 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | $499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 561 | 560 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | $579.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.86 | 12.83 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 1006 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 3,090.4 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1536 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.2 GTexel / s | 128.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 195 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 170 mm | 10.0" (25.4 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2048 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
