AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 1166.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- 5.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 versus 11380
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1730 versus 1308
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.048 versus 30.505
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 969.655 versus 705.293
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.655 versus 3.085
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.807 versus 35.416
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 239.111 versus 62.69
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 140 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 versus 11380 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 versus 1308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 versus 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 969.655 versus 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.655 versus 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.807 versus 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 239.111 versus 62.69 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 66.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 896
- 900.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 66.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 | 11380 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | 1308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 969.655 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.655 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.807 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 239.111 | 62.69 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3999 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GK106 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 6 September 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | $229 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 771 | 774 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | $349.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.72 | 14.35 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 1,981 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 960 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.08 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon E8950
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
