AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1176 MHz
- Environ 40% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 66.08 GTexel / s versus 47.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- 5.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 versus 10982
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1728 versus 1231
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 versus 54.294
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 versus 795.325
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.656 versus 3.692
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 51.794
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 versus 174.513
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1176 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.08 GTexel / s versus 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 640 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 versus 10982 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 versus 1231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 versus 54.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 versus 795.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 versus 3.692 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 51.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 versus 174.513 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1096 MHz versus 1090 MHz
- 684.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,505 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz versus 1090 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,505 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 | 10982 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 | 1231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 54.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 795.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 3.692 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 51.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 174.513 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3374 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GM107 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 770 | 772 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1176 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 1096 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 1,505 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.08 GTexel / s | 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon E8950
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
