NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- 635.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,399 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 70 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
| Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 versus 8 August 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1093 MHz versus 1090 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,399 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 70 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- Environ 51% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 66.08 GTexel / s versus 43.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 6.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 versus 10582
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.048 versus 52.821
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 969.655 versus 793.297
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.655 versus 3.631
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.807 versus 48.966
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 239.111 versus 163.204
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.08 GTexel / s versus 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 640 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 versus 10582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 versus 52.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 969.655 versus 793.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.655 versus 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.807 versus 48.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 239.111 versus 163.204 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3237 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | 65217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | 55.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | 969.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 4.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | 76.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | 239.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Baffin |
| Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 | 8 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 771 | 772 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1093 MHz | 1090 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,399 gflops | 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.72 GTexel / s | 66.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon E8950
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
