AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon R9 380
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 380 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 42% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 154.4 GTexel / s versus 108.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1792
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 58% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 190 Watt
- 6.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6600 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8001 versus 6134
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 versus 654
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 versus 58.135
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 1503.633
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 7635
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 7635
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3675 versus 2793
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz versus 970 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 154.4 GTexel / s versus 108.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1792 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 190 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz versus 970 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8001 versus 6134 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 versus 654 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 versus 58.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 1503.633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 7635 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 versus 2793 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380
- 709.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,476 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 versus 33840
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 1674
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 1674
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,476 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 versus 33840 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8001 | 6134 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 | 654 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33840 | 76397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 58.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1503.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 | 2793 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | Antigua |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 384 | 385 |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | $264.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | 31.71 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | 970 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 32 | 28 |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | 3,476 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | 1792 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 154.4 GTexel / s | 108.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 190 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 221 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2 x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | 970 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR |