AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 380
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1206 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 154.4 GTexel / s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 6.8x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8002 vs 6135
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 654
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 vs 58.135
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 1503.633
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 7635
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 7635
- Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3675 vs 2793
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s vs 108.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8002 vs 6135 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 654 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 vs 58.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 1503.633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 7635 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 vs 2793 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380
- 709.4x better floating-point performance: 3,476 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 33858
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1674
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 3,476 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 vs 33858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8002 | 6135 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 | 654 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33858 | 76397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 58.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1503.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 | 2793 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Antigua |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 384 | 385 |
Price now | $109.99 | $264.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | 31.71 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | 970 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 3,476 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s | 108.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 190 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 221 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 970 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR |