AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1506 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1845 MHz versus 1683 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 162.4 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 1750x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2024.814 versus 1718.593
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 versus 12.283
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 versus 28.289
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 742.778 versus 710.366
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 versus 3340
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 versus 3340
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 versus 10 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1506 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz versus 1683 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 8 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 versus 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 versus 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 versus 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 versus 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Environ 36% de pipelines plus haut: 1920 versus 1408
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13507 versus 9160
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 versus 784
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 versus 128.135
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 versus 11075
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 versus 11075
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6066 versus 4894
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 1408 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13507 versus 9160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 versus 784 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44918 versus 44851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 versus 128.135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 versus 11075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 versus 11075 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 versus 4894 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9160 | 13507 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 851 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44851 | 44918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4894 | 6066 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 | 10 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $379 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 288 | 278 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 22 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | 500 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | 2-slot |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |