AMD Radeon RX 560 versus AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 560 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 81.60 GTexel/s versus 89.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60-80 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 5.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1250 MHz
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 31 January 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s versus 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1200-1275 MHz
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1024
- 1102.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,867 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 versus 57671
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 versus 56.81
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 versus 775.281
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 versus 4.602
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.23 versus 64.428
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 versus 257.062
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 versus 6571
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 versus 6571
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1914 versus 1779
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1200-1275 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,867 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 versus 57671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 versus 56.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 versus 775.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 versus 4.602 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 versus 64.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 versus 257.062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 versus 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 versus 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 versus 1779 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 560 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3650 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | 82144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1779 | 1914 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 560 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Tahiti |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 31 January 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | $449 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 525 | 528 |
| Prix maintenant | $104.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200-1275 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14/16 | 28 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.6 TFLOPs | 2,867 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 170 mm | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 240 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 560 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Mobile
