AMD Radeon RX 590 versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 590 and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.48 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 7.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 137.469 versus 114.288
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.352 versus 10.947
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 versus 118.411
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 versus 683.568
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 versus 11675
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 versus 11675
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4762 versus 4242
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9464 versus 9443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 versus 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 versus 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 versus 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 versus 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4762 versus 4242 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- 833x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,914 gflops versus 7.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 796
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 versus 2083.862
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 5,914 gflops versus 7.1 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 versus 796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 versus 2083.862 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9464 | 9443 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 | 819 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 46611 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 2911.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4762 | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 30 | Grenada |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 | 18 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $429 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 260 | 279 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | 44 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | 5,914 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | 2816 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 6,200 million |
Pipelines | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 275 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 512 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |