AMD Radeon RX 590 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 590 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1469 MHz versus 1156 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1471 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 210 Watt
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 versus 768
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 versus 1765.06
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 versus 79.32
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 versus 14 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz versus 1156 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1471 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 210 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 versus 768 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 versus 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 versus 79.32 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Environ 48% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 330.00 GTexel/s versus 222.48 GTexel/s
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 10.5 TFLOPs versus 7.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13093 versus 9374
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 versus 45591
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 184.405 versus 137.469
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.606 versus 12.352
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1022.925 versus 762.142
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14462 versus 13383
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14462 versus 13383
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1501 versus 1081
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 330.00 GTexel/s versus 222.48 GTexel/s |
Performance á point flottant | 10.5 TFLOPs versus 7.1 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13093 versus 9374 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 versus 45591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 184.405 versus 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.606 versus 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1022.925 versus 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14462 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14462 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1501 versus 1081 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9374 | 13093 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | 768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45591 | 163998 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 184.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 1022.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1081 | 1501 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 30 | Vega 10 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | Radeon RX Vega Series |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 | 14 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 280 | 224 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1471 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | 56 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz | 1156 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | 10.5 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | 94.00 GP/s |
Render output units | 32 | 64 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | 3584 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s | 330.00 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 144 | 256 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 210 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 12,500 million |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 410 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |