AMD Radeon RX 590 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.48 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 46559 versus 44919
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 versus 1718.593
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.352 versus 12.283
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 versus 28.289
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 versus 710.366
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3340
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3340
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 versus 10 June 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 8 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 46559 versus 44919 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 versus 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 versus 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 versus 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 versus 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1469 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- 910.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,463 gflops versus 7.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 175 Watt
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13509 versus 9463
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 versus 796
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 versus 137.469
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 versus 13383
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 versus 13383
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6065 versus 4760
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1469 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops versus 7.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13509 versus 9463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 versus 796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 versus 137.469 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 versus 13383 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6065 versus 4760 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9463 | 13509 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 | 851 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 46559 | 44919 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4760 | 6065 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Polaris 30 | GP104 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 | 10 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $379 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 260 | 279 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | 6,463 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1920 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |