AMD Radeon RX 6600 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1626 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2491 MHz versus 1680 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 21% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 132 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15138 versus 14150
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 872 versus 748
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 72102 versus 71655
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 260.061 versus 217.59
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5472.868 versus 3103.927
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 290.312 versus 134.68
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 26778 versus 7442
- 10.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 69225 versus 6714
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 26778 versus 7442
- 10.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 69225 versus 6714
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8084 versus 7483
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 Oct 2021 versus 7 January 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1626 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2491 MHz versus 1680 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15138 versus 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 872 versus 748 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72102 versus 71655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 versus 217.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 versus 3103.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 versus 134.68 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 versus 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 versus 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 versus 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 versus 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8084 versus 7483 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 1920 versus 1792
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.666 versus 20.421
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 19713
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 19713
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 1792 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.666 versus 20.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1155.956 versus 1152.228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 19713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 19713 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15138 | 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 872 | 748 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72102 | 71655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 | 217.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | 3103.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.421 | 21.666 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 | 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.228 | 1155.956 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8084 | 7483 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 23 XL | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 13 Oct 2021 | 7 January 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 38 | 158 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2491 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 28 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1626 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.928 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 159.4 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 279.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11060 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | 2 |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |