AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- Environ 55% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 465.1 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 300 Watt versus 320 Watt
- Environ 60% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 16 GB versus 10 GB
- Environ 68% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26857 versus 25320
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 versus 1041
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 versus 457.414
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 175.219
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 2381.93
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20911 versus 17705
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt versus 320 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 10 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26857 versus 25320 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 versus 1041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 versus 457.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 2381.93 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20911 versus 17705 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Environ 70% de pipelines plus haut: 8704 versus 5120
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 168014 versus 160986
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 versus 17213
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 versus 17213
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 8704 versus 5120 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 168014 versus 160986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 versus 51.155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26857 | 25320 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 1041 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160986 | 168014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 457.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 6022.79 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 51.221 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 2381.93 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 34537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 34537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20911 | 17705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Nom de code | Navi 21 | GA102 |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 70 | 52 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 80 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 8704 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 320 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
| Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 10 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 320 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
IntelArc A770
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
