AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 versus AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1240 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 800x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,760 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 8% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 70 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 versus 237.944
- 29.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3455 versus 115.4
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 8 August 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1240 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,760 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 70 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 versus 237.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 versus 115.4 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- 3.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 22% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 67.2 GTexel / s versus 55 GTexel / s
- Environ 27% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 704
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4101 versus 2106
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 versus 518
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17592 versus 14583
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 versus 40.991
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 versus 364.578
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.656 versus 3.196
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 54.784
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6821 versus 3455
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1730 versus 1201
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.2 GTexel / s versus 55 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 versus 704 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4101 versus 2106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 versus 518 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17592 versus 14583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 versus 40.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 versus 364.578 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 versus 3.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 54.784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 versus 3455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 versus 1201 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 | 4101 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | 578 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 | 17592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | 55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | 970.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | 4.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | 76.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | 237.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 115.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 | 1730 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Raven | Baffin |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 8 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 795 | 540 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | |
Prix maintenant | $179.50 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1240 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1090 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,760 gflops | 2.2 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 896 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55 GTexel / s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 70 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 3,000 million |
Unités de Compute | 14 | |
GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Longeur | 170 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |