AMD Radeon Vega 3 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 3
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 versus 830
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 versus 253
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3963 versus 2902
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 183.156 versus 166.832
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.933 versus 12.415
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 versus 36.916
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 versus 1693
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 versus 1693
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 418 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 18 June 2014 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 versus 1693 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 versus 327 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 14.43 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 80% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 384.0 gflops
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 versus 10.049
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.817 versus 0.75
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1412
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 3174
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1412
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 3174
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 384.0 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 versus 10.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 versus 0.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 3174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 3174 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Owl | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 18 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1267 | 1311 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |