AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient versus NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 55 Watt
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 versus 1356
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 versus 281
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 versus 12.383
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 versus 1.107
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 versus 21.761
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 versus 40.703
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 versus 2294
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 versus 2294
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 versus 23 July 2013 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 55 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 versus 1356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 versus 281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 versus 12.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 versus 1.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 versus 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 versus 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 versus 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 versus 2294 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 667 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 versus 176.928
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 versus 3170
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 versus 3170
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 667 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 versus 176.928 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 versus 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 versus 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 1356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 12.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 358.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | 0 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4467 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Raven | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 973 | 1105 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $84.95 | |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 667 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 2,540 million |
Performance á point flottant | 768.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 576 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.02 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-A (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3008 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |