ATI FirePro V4800 versus ATI Radeon HD 5770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo ATI FirePro V4800 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le ATI FirePro V4800
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 69 Watt versus 108 Watt
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 versus 334
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 56.777 versus 48.793
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3326 versus 2799
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3326 versus 2799
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 26 April 2010 versus 13 October 2009 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt versus 108 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 versus 334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.777 versus 48.793 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 versus 2799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 versus 2799 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5770
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 775 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 400
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 620.0 gflops
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 3600 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1342 versus 1204
- 6.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 versus 1672
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.373 versus 5.886
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 459.025 versus 321.782
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.906 versus 0.529
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.022 versus 14.184
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2636 versus 1512
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2673 versus 2211
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2636 versus 1512
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2673 versus 2211
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 400 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 620.0 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1342 versus 1204 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10495 versus 1672 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.373 versus 5.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 459.025 versus 321.782 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.906 versus 0.529 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.022 versus 14.184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2636 versus 1512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2673 versus 2211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2636 versus 1512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2673 versus 2211 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: ATI FirePro V4800
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | ATI FirePro V4800 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 | 1342 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | 334 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1672 | 10495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.886 | 9.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 321.782 | 459.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.529 | 0.906 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.184 | 27.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.777 | 48.793 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1512 | 2636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2211 | 2673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | 2799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1512 | 2636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2211 | 2673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 | 2799 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| ATI FirePro V4800 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Redwood | Juniper |
| Date de sortie | 26 April 2010 | 13 October 2009 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189 | $159 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1112 | 1113 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 620.0 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.5 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 627 million | 1,040 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | 208 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 57.6 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer ATI FirePro V4800 avec des autres
ATIFirePro V4800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GS
ATIFirePro V4800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 630i
ATIFirePro V4800 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5770
ATIFirePro V4800 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670 OEM
ATIFirePro V4800 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M
ATIFirePro V4800 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250
