Intel HD Graphics 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4000

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 950 MHz
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 1913
Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 1913

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	14 May 2012 versus 22 March 2012
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz versus 950 MHz
Processus de fabrication	22 nm versus 28 nm
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392 versus 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392 versus 1913

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

24x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 16
19.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 652.8 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1202 versus 347
Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 versus 194
7.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3802 versus 538
Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.947 versus 8.712
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.824 versus 155.638
Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.982 versus 0.931
2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.773 versus 7.36
Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.111 versus 12.009
3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 versus 754
2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 versus 1492
3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 versus 754
2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 versus 1492

Caractéristiques
Pipelines	384 versus 16
Performance á point flottant	652.8 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1202 versus 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	239 versus 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	3802 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.947 versus 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	340.824 versus 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.982 versus 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.773 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	23.111 versus 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2283 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3299 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2283 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3299 versus 1492

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

347

1202

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

194

239

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

538

3802

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.712

9.947

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

155.638

340.824

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.931

0.982

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.36

18.773

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.009

23.111

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

1913

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

1913

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark	347	1202
PassMark - G2D Mark	194	239
Geekbench - OpenCL	538	3802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.712	9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.638	340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931	0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.36	18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.009	23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	754	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392	1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	754	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392	1913
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	414

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 7.0	Kepler
Nom de code	Ivy Bridge GT2	GK107
Date de sortie	14 May 2012	22 March 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1501	1188
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz	950 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	650 MHz
Performance á point flottant	33.6 gflops	652.8 gflops
Processus de fabrication	22 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	16	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	45 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,200 million	1,270 million
Noyaux CUDA		384
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	11.1 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.0	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	128bit
Mémoire partagé	1	0
RAM maximale		1 GB
Vitesse de mémoire		1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire		DDR3\GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus