NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 6x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 16
- 7.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 437 versus 347
- 3.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2108 versus 538
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.144 versus 155.638
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.605 versus 12.009
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 versus 754
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 versus 1492
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 versus 754
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 versus 1492
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 versus 14 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 96 versus 16 |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 437 versus 347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2108 versus 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 versus 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 versus 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 versus 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 versus 1492 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 715 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 192 versus 126
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 versus 4.233
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.519
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.36 versus 7.151
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 715 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 versus 126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 versus 4.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 versus 0.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 versus 7.151 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 437 | 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 | 192 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2108 | 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 2392 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Generation 7.0 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 | 14 May 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1505 | 1506 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 715 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 16 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,200 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
Quick Sync |