Intel HD Graphics 4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4000

versus

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
Environ 44% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 450 MHz
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 75 Watt
Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.865
3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 versus 218
4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 versus 374
4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 543
3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 versus 218
4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 versus 374
4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 543

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	14 May 2012 versus 22 February 2011
Vitesse du noyau	650 MHz versus 450 MHz
Processus de fabrication	22 nm versus 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt versus 75 Watt
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931 versus 0.865
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	754 versus 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492 versus 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392 versus 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	754 versus 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492 versus 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392 versus 543

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 18 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
15x plus de pipelines: 240 versus 16
12.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 432.0 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 998 versus 347
Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 versus 194
7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3773 versus 538
Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.95 versus 8.712
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 325.007 versus 155.638
Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.794 versus 7.36
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.961 versus 12.009

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	18 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	240 versus 16
Performance á point flottant	432.0 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	998 versus 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	315 versus 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	3773 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.95 versus 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	325.007 versus 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.794 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.961 versus 12.009

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

347

998

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

194

315

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

538

3773

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.712

10.95

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

155.638

325.007

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.931

0.865

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.36

13.794

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.009

27.961

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

218

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

374

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

543

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

754

218

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1492

374

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

543

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	347	998
PassMark - G2D Mark	194	315
Geekbench - OpenCL	538	3773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.712	10.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.638	325.007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931	0.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.36	13.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.009	27.961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	754	218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492	374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392	543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	754	218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492	374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392	543
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 4000	NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 7.0	Fermi
Nom de code	Ivy Bridge GT2	GF104
Date de sortie	14 May 2012	22 February 2011
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1501	1502
Genre	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$398.96
Prix maintenant		$199.95
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		7.98
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	650 MHz	450 MHz
Performance á point flottant	33.6 gflops	432.0 gflops
Processus de fabrication	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	16	240
Taux de remplissage de la texture	4.2 GTexel / s	18 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	75 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,200 million	1,950 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Taille du laptop		large
Soutien API
DirectX	11.1 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.0	4.6
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	256 Bit
Mémoire partagé	1	0
RAM maximale		2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		80.0 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		2500 MHz
Genre de mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync