Intel HD Graphics 4400 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 versus 225
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 versus 6.498
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 154.696 versus 140.06
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 versus 0.502
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 versus 2073
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 versus 2073
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 September 2013 versus 15 May 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 versus 225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 versus 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 versus 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 versus 0.502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 versus 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 versus 2073 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.96 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s
- 4.8x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 20
- 6.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 311.0 gflops versus 46 gflops
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 versus 524
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 versus 2143
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.613 versus 9.084
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.49 versus 8.335
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 versus 817
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 versus 1381
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 versus 817
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 versus 1381
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 170 versus 152
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops versus 46 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 versus 524 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 versus 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 versus 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 versus 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 versus 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 versus 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 versus 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 versus 1381 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 versus 152 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | 681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | 2473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 3 September 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1421 | 1440 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $99.21 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 810 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 46 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.6 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 392 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |