Intel HD Graphics 4400 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 938 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 65% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 versus 450
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 versus 119
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 versus 6.901
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 154.696 versus 146.913
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 versus 0.587
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 versus 2035
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 versus 2035
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 September 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 938 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 versus 450 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 versus 119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 versus 6.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 versus 146.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 versus 0.587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 versus 2035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 versus 2035 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.4 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s
- 4.8x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 20
- 5.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 240.0 gflops versus 46 gflops
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2612 versus 2143
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 9.084
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.755 versus 8.335
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 versus 817
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 versus 1381
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 versus 817
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 versus 1381
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops versus 46 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2612 versus 2143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 9.084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 versus 8.335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 versus 817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 versus 1381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 versus 817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 versus 1381 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | 450 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | 2612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | 6.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | 146.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | 10.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | 22.755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | 2035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | 2035 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF117 |
| Date de sortie | 3 September 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1421 | 1438 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 938 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 46 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.6 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4400 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7560D
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350G
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620M
IntelHD Graphics 4400 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
