Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 versus 322
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 131
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 1283
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 2.471
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 77.99
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.233
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 versus 6.018
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 versus 4.053
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 versus 555
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 835
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 1155
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 versus 555
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 835
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 1155
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 versus 87
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 2 April 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 versus 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 versus 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 versus 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 versus 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 versus 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 versus 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 versus 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 1155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 versus 87 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 400 MHz
- Environ 30% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 6.5 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 20
- 3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 155.5 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Environ 55% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 45 Watt
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 48 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 1155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 87 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF119 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 2 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 1626 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 292 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1024 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
