Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 160 Watt
Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 24 September 2011 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Environ 95% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 778 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 43.6 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 16.8x plus de pipelines: 336 versus 20
- 20.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,045.6 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1866 versus 630
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 versus 314
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7872 versus 3210
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.161 versus 8.844
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 versus 171.17
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.125 versus 1.115
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 versus 10.385
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.212 versus 12.361
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3537 versus 988
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3398 versus 1702
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3117 versus 2808
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3537 versus 988
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3398 versus 1702
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3117 versus 2808
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 778 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.6 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 336 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,045.6 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1866 versus 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 versus 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7872 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 versus 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3537 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3398 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 versus 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3537 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3398 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 versus 2808 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 1866 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 7872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 22.161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 781.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 2.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 47.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 75.212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3117 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 24 September 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 824 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Prix maintenant | $199.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 778 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 336 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 43.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 392 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 210 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.2 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |