Intel HD Graphics 520 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 520

versus

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 24 versus 16
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 versus 347
Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 versus 194
7.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 versus 538
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 8.712
Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 versus 0.931
Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 versus 7.36
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 versus 12.009
Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 versus 754
Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 versus 2392
Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 versus 754
Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 versus 2392

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 September 2015 versus 14 May 2012
Pipelines	24 versus 16
Processus de fabrication	14 nm versus 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 45 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	864 versus 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	209 versus 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	3993 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	21.852 versus 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.243 versus 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.958 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	28.182 versus 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	951 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3337 versus 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	951 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3337 versus 2392

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 300 MHz
Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 versus 143.083
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 versus 1462
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 versus 1462

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	650 MHz versus 300 MHz
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.638 versus 143.083
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492 versus 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492 versus 1462

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

864

347

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

209

194

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3993

538

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

21.852

8.712

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

143.083

155.638

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.243

0.931

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.958

7.36

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

28.182

12.009

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

951

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1462

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3337

2392

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

951

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1462

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3337

2392

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 520	Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	864	347
PassMark - G2D Mark	209	194
Geekbench - OpenCL	3993	538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	21.852	8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	143.083	155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.243	0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.958	7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	28.182	12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	951	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1462	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3337	2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	951	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1462	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3337	2392
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	326	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 520	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.0	Generation 7.0
Nom de code	Skylake GT2	Ivy Bridge GT2
Date de sortie	1 September 2015	14 May 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1381	1501
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz	1050 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	300 MHz	650 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	24	16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	1,200 million
Performance á point flottant		33.6 gflops
Taux de remplissage de la texture		4.2 GTexel / s
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 1.0 x16
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.0
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	32 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Genre de mémoire	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Mémoire partagé	1	1
Technologies
Quick Sync