Intel HD Graphics 530 versus AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 5.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 86 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 1 GB
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 8.039
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 0.867
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 21 January 2011 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 86 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 8.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 0.867 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6750
- 30x plus de pipelines: 720 versus 24
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,008.0 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 versus 995
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 280 versus 254
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 versus 330.464
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.664 versus 19.781
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.074 versus 30.177
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2100 versus 1045
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 versus 2393
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2100 versus 1045
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 versus 2393
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 720 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,008.0 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 versus 995 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 280 versus 254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 versus 330.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 versus 19.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 versus 30.177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2100 versus 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3378 versus 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2100 versus 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3378 versus 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 1045 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 280 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 8.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 544.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 0.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 20.664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 91.074 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | Juniper |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 21 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1248 | 1020 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $49.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 720 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 86 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 170 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 73.6 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 530 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon 620
