Intel HD Graphics 620 versus AMD Radeon R7 M340
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M340 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 1021 MHz
- Environ 47% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 17.16 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 versus 651
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 versus 152
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 versus 13.48
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.879 versus 164.511
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 versus 0.943
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 1668
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 1668
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 5 May 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 1021 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 17.16 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 versus 651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 versus 152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 versus 13.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 versus 164.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 versus 0.943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 versus 1732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 versus 1732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 1668 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M340
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 943 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 13.3x plus de pipelines: 320 versus 24
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 549.1 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5185 versus 4178
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.063 versus 15.582
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.38 versus 30.288
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1550 versus 1404
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1550 versus 1404
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 943 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 549.1 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5185 versus 4178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.063 versus 15.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.38 versus 30.288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1550 versus 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1550 versus 1404 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M340
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M340 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 | 5185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | 13.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | 164.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | 0.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | 20.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | 74.38 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 1550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | 1732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 1550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | 1732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 1668 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M340 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Meso |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1334 | 1383 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1021 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 943 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 17.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore |