Intel HD Graphics 620 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 620

versus

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 620

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 3 mois plus tard
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 24 versus 16
12x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 403.2 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 versus 347
Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 versus 194
7.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4178 versus 538
2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 versus 8.712
Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.879 versus 155.638
Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 versus 0.931
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.582 versus 7.36
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.288 versus 12.009
Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 versus 754
Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1733 versus 1492
Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 2392
Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 versus 754
Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1733 versus 1492
Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 2392

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	30 August 2016 versus 14 May 2012
Taux de remplissage de la texture	25.2 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	24 versus 16
Performance á point flottant	403.2 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Processus de fabrication	14 nm versus 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 45 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	922 versus 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	216 versus 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	4178 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.275 versus 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	227.879 versus 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.508 versus 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.582 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	30.288 versus 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1404 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1733 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340 versus 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1404 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1733 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340 versus 2392

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 300 MHz

Vitesse du noyau	650 MHz versus 300 MHz

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

922

347

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

216

194

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4178

538

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.275

8.712

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

227.879

155.638

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.508

0.931

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.582

7.36

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.288

12.009

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1404

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1733

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

2392

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1404

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1733

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

2392

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 620	Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	922	347
PassMark - G2D Mark	216	194
Geekbench - OpenCL	4178	538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.275	8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	227.879	155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.508	0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.582	7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	30.288	12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1404	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1733	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340	2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1404	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1733	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340	2392
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	343	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 620	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Generation 7.0
Nom de code	Kaby Lake GT2	Ivy Bridge GT2
Date de sortie	30 August 2016	14 May 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1334	1501
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz	1050 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	300 MHz	650 MHz
Performance á point flottant	403.2 gflops	33.6 gflops
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	24	16
Taux de remplissage de la texture	25.2 GTexel / s	4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	1,200 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 1.0 x16
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.0
Mémoire
RAM maximale	32 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Genre de mémoire	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Mémoire partagé	1	1
Technologies
Quick Sync