Intel HD Graphics 630 versus AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 47% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 27.6 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 versus 896
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 versus 12.111
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 versus 253.178
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 versus 1.211
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 versus 1645
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 1677
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 versus 1645
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 1677
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 30 June 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 versus 896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 versus 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 versus 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 versus 1.211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 1677 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 730 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 599.0 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 versus 268
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 versus 4554
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 versus 20.404
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 versus 32.567
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 versus 1945
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 versus 1945
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 versus 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 versus 4554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 versus 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 versus 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 versus 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 versus 1945 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 5684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 1677 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Oland |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 30 June 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 1199 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 780 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 730 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz |