Intel HD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 vs 896
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 12.111
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 vs 253.178
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 1.211
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 vs 1645
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1677
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 vs 1645
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1677

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 36% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 268
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 4554
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 20.404
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 32.567
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1945
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 896
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 304
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 5684
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 12.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 253.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 1.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 23.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 73.506
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 1677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 1677

Compare specifications (specs)