Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 versus AMD Radeon R7 350
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon R7 350 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 versus 25.507
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 versus 2072
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 versus 2072
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2017 versus 6 July 2016 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 versus 25.507 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 versus 2072 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 10.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 48
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7742 versus 6424
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 versus 246.614
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.719 versus 1.888
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 versus 21.014
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 versus 42.981
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 versus 1514
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3333
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 versus 1514
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 48 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7742 versus 6424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 versus 246.614 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.719 versus 1.888 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 versus 21.014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 versus 42.981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6424 | 7742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | 25.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | 647.813 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | 2.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | 44.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | 109.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R7 350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT3e | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2017 | 6 July 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1159 | 1099 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 MXR
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce3 Ti200
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 A360
