Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 versus AMD Radeon HD 6790
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 versus 1616
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 versus 12.318
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 versus 1.234
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 4 April 2011 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 versus 1616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 versus 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 versus 1.234 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6790
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 840 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 11.1x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 72
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 versus 361
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 748.068 versus 450.087
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.768 versus 25.346
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.423 versus 67.077
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3127 versus 2846
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3534 versus 1668
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3127 versus 2846
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3534 versus 1668
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 840 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 72 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 versus 361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 748.068 versus 450.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.768 versus 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.423 versus 67.077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3127 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3534 versus 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3127 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3534 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 1616 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 374 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | 748.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | 1.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | 28.768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | 121.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT4e | Barts |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 4 April 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 993 | 857 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.40 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 800 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,700 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,344.0 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 198 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 134.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 avec des autres
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
ATIRadeon 9500
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDFirePro M5950
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
