Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 versus 225
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 versus 22.828
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 versus 210.585
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 10 March 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 915 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 versus 225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 versus 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 versus 210.585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 8.9x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 72
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3028 versus 1978
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10102 versus 8759
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.416 versus 3.059
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.662 versus 25.346
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 versus 67.077
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 1668
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 1668
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 72 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3028 versus 1978 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10102 versus 8759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.416 versus 3.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 versus 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 versus 67.077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 3028 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 | 10102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | 3.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT4e | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 10 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 993 | 899 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 or 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 avec des autres
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDFirePro M5950
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
IntelArc A350M
