Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon Pro W5500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 8.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3463
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 10 Feb 2020 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- 4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 52.80 GTexel/s
- 3.7x plus de pipelines: 1408 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 10 nm
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 79.859
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 1138.276
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 4.596
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 61.742
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 193.829
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 5609
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 5609
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 52.80 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1408 versus 384 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 10 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 79.859 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 1138.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 4.596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 61.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 193.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 5609 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Navi 14 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 621 | 330 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1187 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1408 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | 44.80 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Largeur | IGP | Single-slot |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
