Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel UHD Graphics 605

AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 371 vs 337
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 108 vs 99
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 vs 701
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 vs 1338
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 1811
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 vs 701
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 vs 1338
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 1811

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 December 2017 vs 11 June 2014
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	371 vs 337
PassMark - G2D Mark	108 vs 99
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	724 vs 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1643 vs 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1961 vs 1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	724 vs 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1643 vs 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1961 vs 1811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

4x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 200 MHz
7.1x more pipelines: 128 vs 18
5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 1453
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.721 vs 4.247
Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.613 vs 66.304
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.445 vs 0.406
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 vs 3.902
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.097 vs 5.113

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	800 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines	128 vs 18
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	8386 vs 1453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.721 vs 4.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	107.613 vs 66.304
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.445 vs 0.406
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.612 vs 3.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	13.097 vs 5.113

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

371

337

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

108

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1453

8386

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.247

4.721

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

66.304

107.613

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.406

0.445

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.902

10.612

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.113

13.097

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

701

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1643

1338

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1961

1811

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

701

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1643

1338

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1961

1811

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 605	AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark	371	337
PassMark - G2D Mark	108	99
Geekbench - OpenCL	1453	8386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.247	4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	66.304	107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.406	0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.902	10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	5.113	13.097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	724	701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1643	1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1961	1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	724	701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1643	1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1961	1811

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 605	AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 2.0
Code name	Gemini Lake GT1	Beema
Launch date	11 December 2017	11 June 2014
Place in performance rating	1546	1547
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	800 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	18	128
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	930 million
Floating-point performance		204.8 gflops
Texture fill rate		6.4 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit
Memory type	DDR4 / LPDDR4	System Shared
Shared memory	1
Technologies
Quick Sync