Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 371 vs 336
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 108 vs 99
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 vs 701
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 vs 1338
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 1811
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 vs 701
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 vs 1338
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 1811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

• 4x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 7.1x more pipelines: 128 vs 18
• 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 1459
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.721 vs 4.247
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.613 vs 66.304
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.445 vs 0.406
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 vs 3.902
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.097 vs 5.113

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	371 336
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	108 99
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1459 8386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.247 4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	66.304 107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.406 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.902 10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.113 13.097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1643 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1643 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 1811

Compare specifications (specs)