Intel UHD Graphics 610 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 20 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 versus 173
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2691 versus 2344
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 versus 4 May 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 20 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 711 versus 709 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 versus 173 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2691 versus 2344 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1583 versus 1071
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1583 versus 1071
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 versus 1241
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 versus 1241
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3127 versus 1699
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3127 versus 1699
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 versus 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 versus 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 versus 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 versus 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 versus 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 versus 1699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 711 | 709 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 173 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2691 | 2344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 2289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 2289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.954 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT1 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 | 4 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1342 | 1345 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $849.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $849.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | Up to 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\DDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 610 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800M GTS
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350G
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon 660M
