Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 717 vs 692
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 177 vs 172
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2695 vs 2199
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 4 May 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 717 vs 692 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 177 vs 172 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2695 vs 2199 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1583 vs 1071
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1583 vs 1071
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 vs 1241
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 vs 1241
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3127 vs 1699
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3127 vs 1699
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 vs 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 vs 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 vs 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 717 | 692 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 177 | 172 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2695 | 2199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 2289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 2289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 4 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1337 | 1341 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $849.99 | |
| Price now | $849.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
| CUDA cores | Up to 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3140 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 610 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800M GT
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7500G
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350G
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon 660M
