Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus ATI Radeon HD 5570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and ATI Radeon HD 5570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 77% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 39 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 versus 478
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 versus 198
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 versus 1370
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 4.393
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 versus 235.572
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 0.454
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 11.345
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 versus 1160
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 versus 1160
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 11 October 2011 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 39 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 versus 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 versus 198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 versus 1370 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 4.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 versus 235.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 versus 0.454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 versus 11.345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 versus 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 versus 1160 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5570
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16.7x plus de pipelines: 400 versus 24
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 versus 31.881
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 2227
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 2227
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 versus 24 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 versus 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 2227 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | ATI Radeon HD 5570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 1370 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 4.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 235.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 0.454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 11.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 49.016 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1883 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Turks |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 11 October 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 1369 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 650 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 400 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 39 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 716 million |
Performance á point flottant | 520.0 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 165 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity |