Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 4 GB
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 25 October 2016 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 4 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- 4.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1290 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1392 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- 26.7x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 24
- 4.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 versus 1042
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 versus 241
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 versus 4592
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 27.062
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 versus 273.504
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 versus 1.777
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 versus 19.939
- 7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 versus 31.881
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 2227
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 2227
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 122 versus 62
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1290 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 versus 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 versus 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 versus 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 versus 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 versus 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 versus 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 5029 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 457 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 122 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GP107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 586 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $124.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,300 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,862 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
