Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 16.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 21.3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1536 MB
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 26 March 2010 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1536 MB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 20x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 24
- 4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 versus 1042
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 versus 241
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13143 versus 4592
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.483 versus 27.062
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 706.104 versus 273.504
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 versus 1.777
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.405 versus 19.939
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.875 versus 31.881
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3658 versus 878
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3320 versus 2227
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3658 versus 878
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3320 versus 2227
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13143 versus 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.483 versus 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 versus 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 versus 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 versus 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 versus 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3658 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3320 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3658 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3320 versus 2227 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 4121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 13143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 34.483 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 706.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 4.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 30.405 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 106.875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 5110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 5110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3320 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 26 March 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 742 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $71.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 480 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 480 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,345.0 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way, 3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1536 MB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 177.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
