Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus AMD Radeon RX 480

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon RX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

versus

AMD Radeon RX 480

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
79.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 460.8 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs
10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 150 Watt

Date de sortie	1 September 2017 versus 29 June 2016
Performance á point flottant	460.8 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 150 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480

3.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 350 MHz
Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1266 MHz versus 1200 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 182.3 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
96x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 24
6.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 versus 1237
2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 versus 299
8.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 versus 4657
3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 versus 27.517
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 769.541 versus 354.254
4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.593 versus 1.807
3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 versus 20.323
20.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 versus 29.327
6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 1596
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3309
6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 1596
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3309
14.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 966 versus 68

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1120 MHz versus 350 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1266 MHz versus 1200 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	182.3 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 versus 24
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	8578 versus 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	774 versus 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	39538 versus 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	103.851 versus 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	769.541 versus 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.593 versus 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	67.879 versus 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	597.772 versus 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11172 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 versus 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11172 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 versus 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	966 versus 68

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1237

8578

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

299

774

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4657

39538

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.517

103.851

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

354.254

769.541

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.807

7.593

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20.323

67.879

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.327

597.772

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

11172

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

11172

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3361

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

966

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 630	AMD Radeon RX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark	1237	8578
PassMark - G2D Mark	299	774
Geekbench - OpenCL	4657	39538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.517	103.851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	354.254	769.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.807	7.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	20.323	67.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	29.327	597.772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1870	11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1596	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1870	11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1596	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309	3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	68	966

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 630	AMD Radeon RX 480
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 4.0
Nom de code	Coffee Lake GT2	Ellesmere
Date de sortie	1 September 2017	29 June 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1234	360
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Conception		Radeon RX 400 Series
Génération GCN		4th Gen
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$229
Prix maintenant		$299.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		39.12
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1200 MHz	1266 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	350 MHz	1120 MHz
Performance á point flottant	460.8 gflops	5.8 TFLOPs
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	24	2304
Taux de remplissage de la texture	28.8 GTexel / s	182.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	150 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	5,700 million
Unités de Compute		36
GPU Power		110 Watt
Stream Processors		2304
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bridgeless CrossFire
Soutien de bus		n / a
Longeur		241 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)		500 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		1x 6-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
Vulkan
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	256 bit
Mémoire partagé	1	0
RAM maximale		4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		224 GB/s
Vitesse de mémoire		7000 MHz
Genre de mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
Enduro
FreeSync
FRTC
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HD3D
HDMI 2.0b
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
ZeroCore