Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus Intel Iris Graphics 540
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel Iris Graphics 540 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 1237
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 3158
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 1237
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 3158
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 1 September 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 3158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 3158 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Graphics 540
- 2x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 24
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1258 versus 1243
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 versus 302
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6284 versus 4672
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2308 versus 1870
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2308 versus 1870
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 48 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1258 versus 1243 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 versus 302 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6284 versus 4672 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 versus 1870 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 540
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | 1258 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 323 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4672 | 6284 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | Skylake GT3e |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1219 | 1057 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
| RAM maximale | 64 MB | |
| Genre de mémoire | eDRAM | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
