Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 25.82
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 17 May 2011 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 25.82 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 58% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 45.4 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 14x plus de pipelines: 336 versus 24
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,088.6 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 versus 1237
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 versus 299
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8699 versus 4657
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 versus 354.254
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.201 versus 1.807
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.402 versus 20.323
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.233 versus 29.327
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3754 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 3309
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3754 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 3309
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 45.4 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 336 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,088.6 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 versus 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8699 versus 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 versus 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 versus 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3309 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 2774 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 434 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 8699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 25.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 623.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 2.201 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 30.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 62.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 17 May 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 855 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Prix maintenant | $353.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.61 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 336 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 45.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,950 million |
| Température maximale du GPU | 99 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-Way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
